@article{Nicklas_2013, title={Le prince fêtera ses 500 ans: Réflexions sur la transgression théorique des normes du discours sur le politique (À l’occasion d’une parution récente)}, url={https://savoirsenprisme.univ-reims.fr/index.php/sep/article/view/3}, DOI={10.34929/sep.vi02.3}, abstractNote={<p><em><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 436.978px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.979754);">Le Prince</span></em><span style="left: 237.82px; top: 437.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01195);"> de Machiavel, l’un des ouvrages centraux de la réflexion sur le politique en </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 462.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.921219);">Europe, a été achevé en 1513. Cinq siècles après, ce texte qui transgresse les normes </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 487.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.972906);">convenues du discours interpelle toujours le lecteur. Comment la philosophie </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 512.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.977039);">politique d’aujourd’hui se situe-t-elle par rapport à ce document fondateur ? Afin </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 537.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.967152);">de commémorer cette date importante pour la formation de la pensée sur l’état et </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 562.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.958225);">le pouvoir, le philosophe et député européen Leonidas Donskis a réuni des articles </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 587.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.988335);">consacrés aux notions cruciales de Machiavel. Ce recueil invite à réfléchir sur la portée </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 612.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.985666);">actuelle de l’approche machiavélienne.</span></p> <p><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 612.208px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.985666);"><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 776.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.959282);">Machiavelli’s </span><em><span style="left: 270.968px; top: 776.152px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.998559);">Prince</span></em><span style="left: 319.933px; top: 776.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.994304);"> was finished in 1513. </span><span style="left: 492.542px; top: 776.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.04149);">It remains one of the most important texts </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 801.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.02425);">related to political thought. </span><span style="left: 382.928px; top: 801.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01589);">Written five hundred years ago, this work still invites the </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 826.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.99671);">reader to reflect on politics and human behaviour. </span><span style="left: 549.959px; top: 826.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.980651);">How does political philosophy value </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 851.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.03947);">this document today? In order to give answers to this question, the philosopher and </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 876.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01052);">Member of the European Parliament Leonidas Donskis has edited an essay collection </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 901.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.982783);">which deals with the key notions of Machiavellian thought. These scientific essays give </span><span style="left: 165.354px; top: 926.382px; font-size: 19.1667px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.994843);">a hint about the actual scope of Machiavelli’s approach.</span></span></p&gt;}, number={02}, journal={Savoirs en prisme}, author={Nicklas, Thomas}, year={2013}, month={sept.}, pages={1-10} }